Michael Vrbensky vs Timothee Lustig Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• On second serve points, Lustig has recently scored 37.93%, whereas Vrbensky has achieved 46.05%. Why is this significant? Second serve performance closely correlates with match prediction accuracy.
• Lustig has won 40.74% of opponents' second serve points in return games; Vrbensky has won 45.41%. How about first serve returns? These stand at 28.57% for Lustig and 28.73% for Vrbensky.
• Break point resilience shows Lustig with a 56% save rate compared to Vrbensky's 50.75%, an important piece of data for in-game betting.
• Over the past year, Lustig has a match win rate of 33.33%, while Vrbensky sits at 50.88%. Is there a known advantage here? Performance overview gives us the bigger picture in head-to-head predictions.
• Lustig is best on Hard surfaces with a 43% win rate, whereas Vrbensky excels on Clay, winning 62%. However, both struggle on Indoor Hard courts, with Lustig yet to win.
• Event level experience differs: Lustig mainly competes in Futures/ITF $10K tournaments, winning 36.36%, while Vrbensky participates in Challengers/ITF > $10K, achieving 40% success.
• Against the average opponent ranking, Lustig faces stiffer competition at 172.83 compared to Vrbensky's 408.33 average rank.
• Lustig's deciding set record over the past year is 0%, while Vrbensky has won 50% of his matches that went the distance.
• Break point conversion rates are critical; Lustig has a 25% success, while Vrbensky converts 31.97% of his opportunities.

Editorial Prediction (June 8, 2025, UTC):

The match dynamics between Lustig and Vrbensky reveal certain patterns. Vrbensky holds an edge in second serve points and return games, indicating stronger baseline play under pressure, which is crucial in tight matches.

Despite Lustig's ability to save a higher percentage of break points, Vrbensky's higher breakpoint conversion suggests an offensive advantage in clutch situations.

While Lustig consistently faces tougher opponents, which speaks to experience under challenging conditions, Vrbensky's decisive set performance places him in a favorable position if the match goes the distance.

While specific player advantages on different surfaces are relevant, the current competitive environment and past performance trends favor Vrbensky to emerge triumphant in this encounter.